'>
|
|
There does not remain lots of oldest cities and dwellings but most often only their monuments, patiently rectified and restored, which - if stone were used - testify about them. Dwellings were built with materials much less resistant (wood, plants, raw bricks). One observes sometimes sketches on the ground and some clue (fire place, backyard, storage..). Troy (Turkey) is hidden under 6 or 7 layers of cities built during centuries, and the huts of Gallic are only reconstituted. Egyptian villages let only imagine what they could be, although in this country, dry sand authorised a very exceptional conservation. It should be said that all it is wooden made has generally disappeared, well before fabrics and leather. Finally, earthquakes destroyed a lot too, as for the greek monuments, the French forth crusade. |
Characteristics of these monuments, palate or temples, often astonish. Here are two examples, particularly surprising. Twisted, the Parthenon on the Acropolis ? (Athens, Greece). Its large sides are not rectilinear but slightly curved of a tenth centimetres; in the same way, its columns are slightly tilted towards the interior. Such elegance is finally due to a daring prospect. |
The theatre of Epidaure, Greece, Peloponese.
Well, placed at the highest steps of this huge theatre, you will hear it, far away from the centre, like we heard it ourselves.hibicustour |
In poor and dry countries, as Egypt, Mexico, Sahel Africa... one can see villages of indefinable colour, rather greyish. Their houses are not always built in breeze blocks, but often out of raw brick, i.e. with kneaded and moulded ground bricks, dried in open air. Poor material thinks we; it is only partly true, because they offer a higher comfort by their quality of insulation, much better than that of cooked bricks. A decade ago, an architect had planned to build thus hotels and another buildings with several floors. I retrieve him at the Paris 2004 exhibition. Buildings exist, said he to me, even in Paris, of ground strongly pressed named "pisé", very hard. He propose now modern furniture (seat..), panneling...; contact to : mehdi@mehdidellagi.com |
Cooked Brick. The cooked brick, still very much used nowadays, had its hours of glory at ancient times, not only for the construction of the architectural structure, but also for the completion, the fontages and mural decoration. Many houses and buildongs we can call recent, shows brick decorations (varous colors, twists, checkerworks..), remain everywhere.Thus under old Arab civilizations, the places of worship were built with cooked bricks, who ensured also external decoration. Until the 12 d, 13 d century, roughly speaking. When the fashion had been fading, or the technique progressing, platings were used for the large mosques, in Ispahan (Iran), in Baghdad (Iraq), Cairo Egypt), or for the Taj Mahal mausoleum (India), whose carcass work were always realized with bricks. A large mosque in Ispahan would have required 18 million bricks and 475 thousand enamelled squares.. |
Granite or limestone ?
Egyptians thought that the
granite was most resistant : yes, but for both wear and
compression, not for the inflection. Lintels broke and the
ceiling of the room of the tomb of Cheops is cracked,
although supporting only little weight. They then returned
to limestone for the framings, much more resistant
The Roman concrete The Pantheon (Rome, year 124 after J.C) is covered by a gigantic cupola (more significant than that of Saint-Pierre): this cupola, partitioned inside of small boxes, is built out of cast concrete (moulded into a system of very elaborate formwork). |
The walls, thick and ventilated by two circular corridors consist of two rows of bricks inside whose concrete is run. The Roman concrete consists of hardcores of stone or brick and puzzolane (volcanic ground, well-known by gardeners). |
The Roman arch is inspired by both the Greek and the étrusque technique. But the Romans add the invention of the concrete to it. The arches and vaults are reduced and connections simplified. The Roman arch will be replaced by the Gothic arch, ( We think appeared first in France, then in England, Germany etc). |
The discovery of this concrete allowed to build much more quickly and with a certain lightness. The "Pont du Gard" (bridge of Gard), nearby Nimes, was built with this technique (extrernal stones, insidefilled in with concrete). This invention has however wanished, falling off mememories. Then, ceilings of our cathedrals re-use the heavy stone ! |
|
The stone roofs involve a serious technical problem, of course because of the weight,
but especially by the external push which is exerted on the walls :
To prevent its walls from being quartered, Notre Dame de Paris offers superb ones to us and it is not decoration. With a stone roof in vault, without no cross beam being pressed on the walls, the weight of the roof pushes pushes the walls towards outside. |
The blue mosque, Istanbul. The Mosques are surrounded by smaller spaces and low, also covered of cupolas, or half-cupolas, which "shoulder" the walls of the central room. Ste Sophie concerns the same principle and one can say that propping up them of our cathedrals are placed here inside to increase useful space (personal interpretation) |
Double octogonal cupola for the cathedral of Florence. Completed in 1436, the cupola failed to never be built so its dimensions were exceptional (the tower made nearly 50 meters in diameter and height.) |
. |
The unit is aerated : on the right, in white, one see an opening practised through he 2,25 m thickness; also lighting. One circulates between the two cupolas whose slopes are obvious here, compared to the vertical passage (opposite, in black). Room remaining: 10m - (0,70+2,25) = 62, 25 cm. |
|
technics, communications, production
|